Parashat Chukat

Parashat Chukat

In this week's Parsha, when Miriam dies, the well of water which accompanied the Children of Israel in the wilderness in her merit ceases to do so, leaving Klal Yisrael complaining of thirst. In response to this, Hashem commands Moshe and Aharon: "Take the staff and gather together the Assembly, you and Aharon your brother. And you shall speak to the rock before their eyes, and it shall give its waters." [Bamidbar 20:7-8]. Then, "Moshe raised his arm and struck the rock with his staff twice." [ibid 20:11]. 

Hashem is angered that Moshe hits the rock instead of following His specific instruction to speak to the rock. "Hashem said to Moshe and Aharon: Because you did not believe in me to sanctify me in the eyes of the Children of Israel, therefore you will not bring this congregation to the land which I have given them." [ibid 20:12]. Here, Rashi explains that Hashem is saying, "Had you spoken to the rock, and it would have brought forth water, I would have been sanctified before the eyes of the Assembly, and they would have said 'Just as this rock, which neither speaks nor hears and does not need sustenance nevertheless fulfills the will of Hashem, how much more so should we fulfill His word.'" [Rashi, ibid]. 

At first glance, this seems difficult to understand. When Moshe hits the rock, it still brings forth water. Given that the Children of Israel do not know that Hashem commanded Moshe to speak to the rock, surely, whether Moshe hits the rock or speaks to it, they see the rock produce water and deduce that if a rock obeys Hashem, how much more so should humans obey Him. What is the special significance of speaking to the rock? Why can't the same message come across though hitting it?

Last week, in Parshat Korach, Korach and his followers were unwilling to accept that the Shechinah spoke through Moshe, and that Moshe's instructions to the Children of Israel were really Hashem's instructions. In our parsha, Klal Yisrael may learn from Moshe's action of hitting the rock that they are obligated to listen to Hashem but they would not deduce from this that Moshe was the transmitter of the divine word in this world.  Perhaps Hashem wanted Moshe to speak to the rock so that Klal Yisrael would understand that they are obligated to serve Hashem, from an act that resulted from Moshe's speech, thus correcting the mistake of Korach and his followers and reasserting Moshe's position as the emissary of Hashem. 

This can serve to remind us of the importance of having faith not only in the words of Hashem, but also in those of Moshe and our sages. Pirkei Avot begins with a statement of the authority of Moshe – "Moshe kibel Torah m'sinai" and passed it on, all the way down to the rabbis of later generations, entrusting them with that authority as well. In a world where we are rapidly losing respect for the instruction of the rabbis of long ago, as well as for our leaders today, it is vital for us to internalize this lesson. 

May we all strive to heed the advice of our wise leaders and we should then merit seeing the coming of Moshiach when we will hear Hashem's word directly once again.

Shabbat Shalom

--
Naftali Kassorla

Parshat Korach

Parshat Korach

           This week’s parsha features the rebellion of Korach and his followers against Moshe. Korach’s main point of contention was Moshe’s appointment of Elizafan Ben Uziel as a Prince, even though, in terms of age, Korach was next in line. Korach, perceiving this to be a fabrication of the will of HaShem, gathered together two-hundred and fifty heads of the assembly to challenge Moshe’s leadership.
           The Medrash Tanchuma asks a deeply penetrating question regarding the motives of Korach. “Korach was a clever man; what did he see that brought him to such foolishness? His eyes misled him, for he saw a great chain of descendants emerging from him: Shmuel Hanavi, who was as important as Moshe and Aharon, as it says in Tehillim (99:6) ‘Moshe and Aharon were among his priests and Shmuel was among those who invoke his name.’” Korach saw from the fact that Shmuel the Prophet is mentioned in the same sentence as Moshe and Aharon, that Shmuel is just as important as them.
           Korach’s line of reasoning is very difficult to understand. He feels that he is justified in replacing Moshe and Aharon as leader because he saw that one of his descendants will a very important person. How does his offspring prove that he is fitting to be a leader? If Shmuel himself was leading this rebellion, then the argument would make sense: Shmuel is just as important as Moshe and Aharon, so perhaps he could be fitting to lead in their place. But what does Shmuel’s greatness say about Korach’s own worthiness? Furthermore, this thought process only proves the very opposite Korach’s entire goal. Inherent in his line of reasoning is the assumption that Moshe and Aharon are men of spiritual greatness. Korach deduces that since Shmuel is just as important as them, Korach himself deserves to lead. But yet, he claims that Moshe and Aharon are unfitting, and that they are fabricating the will of HaShem.  How can they be great enough to prove his own greatness, yet not great enough to be the rightful leaders? How can Korach make such an illogical argument?
           From here we can learn a tremendous lesson what personal biases can do to a straight-thinking person. When one has a bias – a negiah – even a minutely subconscious one, he can skew reality with an absolutely newfangled interpretation, just in order for it to fit into his desired goal. Korachs main thrust to overtake Moshe and Aharon was his desire for honor. This negiah led him so far astray: he came to the ridiculous conclusion that he was fitting to be a leader, even though the progeny that would have actually been fitting for the job would not be born for generations.  Additionally, it caused him to mount a rebellion against leaders which he himself inherently believed were great and holy men!
We see further proof to this idea in the very words of the Medrash. It says, “His eyes mistook him for he saw a great chain of descendant’s emerging from him.” Why does the Medrash use the “eyes” to connote his mistake? Why not say simply “he made a mistake”?
The pasuk in Kriat Shemas says “You shall not stray after your heart and after your eyes.” Here, HaShem warns us not to desire that which we see with our eyes. From this we learn that the “eyes” imply desire. Perhaps according this explanation, the Medrash is telling us that Korach’s personal desire for kavod is what led him to skew and misinterpret reality.
        May we merit the strength to realize and overcome our biases, and may we be able to see reality in a pure form that will allow us to fulfill the true will of HaShem.

Shabbat Shalom